Rebuilding Walls
Insisting on a Torah-observant lifestyle results in the restoration of the old social divisions between Jews and Gentiles.
The third chapter of Galatians is pivotal to Paul’s
argument in which he stresses the oneness of God’s people. The old social
divisions existing under the Mosaic Legislation are inappropriate in God’s one
covenant community since the promised “Seed of Abraham” has arrived, Jesus of Nazareth. In his Body, “there can be neither Jew nor Greek.”
The Torah was intended to keep Israel distinct from the
surrounding Gentile nations. When the Church adopts the requirements of the Mosaic Law,
it rebuilds the “middle wall of partition” between Jewish and Gentile
believers, a wall removed by Jesus at great personal cost. Paul presents
an alternative to the Law for defining and identifying the people of God - the
“faith of Jesus Christ” – (Ephesians 2:11-22).
[Photo by Daniel Born on Unsplash] |
Any uncircumcised male under the Law of Moses, regardless of his biological descent, was outside the covenant, and therefore, not a “son of God.” He could only become a member of the community by undergoing circumcision and otherwise adopting a Torah-compliant lifestyle.
- (Galatians 3:26-29) - “For you are all sons of God through the faith of Christ Jesus. For you, as many as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There cannot be Jew or Greek, there cannot be bond or free, there cannot be male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus: Now, if you are of Christ, by consequence, you are Abraham’s seed, according to promise, heirs.”
The Torah also distinguished between slaves and
freemen, and males and females. Because of their periodic uncleanness due to
menstruation, women could not participate fully in the worship rites of the
Temple. They were restricted to the Court of Women at some distance from the Sanctuary
and the presence of Yahweh. They were second-class citizens. If the Galatians placed
its members under the ancient legislation, they would restore that inequity to
its female members.
The “all” in Verse 25 refers to Gentile and Jewish
believers. The Scriptures declared that everyone was confined under the Law before
the “Seed” arrived. Since his arrival, neither group remains under that confinement;
both became sons of God “through the faith of Christ Jesus.”
If adoption into the family of Abraham is through the “faith
of Jesus,” then logically, we do not qualify as the “children of Abraham”
through the deeds and rituals required by the Torah. This does not mean
ethnicity and gender no longer matter in our daily lives. However, such
distinctions have no bearing on our standing before God. Faith and obedience
matter, not ethnicity or gender.
THE CUSTODIAN
The Apostle presents the analogy of the Law as the custodian
and steward of a minor child. In Greco-Roman society, a minor did not enjoy
full liberty and civil rights until he came of age. Though by right destined to
be the master of the household, until the child reached legal age, he was no
freer than household slaves - (Galatians 4:1-7).
“Custodians and stewards” performed two different
functions. First, they took charge of the heir. Second, they managed his estate.
This condition continued until the “time appointed by his father,” and
in Paul’s analogy, this corresponds to the “fullness of time” when God
sent Jesus to redeem us - (Galatians
4:1-10).
The term “elemental principles” translates the Greek
noun 'stoicheion' (Strong’s Concordance, #G4747). It referred to the
basic components that comprised a larger whole. The idea is “element, first
principal, rudiments.” From it came the sense of “elemental principles.”
To adopt circumcision now that the “Seed of Abraham”
has come would mean regression to something rudimentary, a return to an earlier
and more rudimentary stage in God’s redemptive plan.
Jesus came to redeem those “under the Law,” so they could
receive the adoption as children. This refers, firstly, to Jewish believers.
The need to redeem or ransom them implies that being “under the Law” was
a form of bondage. The Torah was incapable of justifying anyone before
God. Paul’s previous statement is conceptually parallel:
- “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us; for it is written: Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree, that upon the Gentiles might come the blessing of Abraham in Christ Jesus; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith” - (Galatians 3:13-14).
The result of this redemption was “adoption.” We are
not God’s “children” through physical birth. All humans are His creatures
but not all are His children. The implication is that Jews,
likewise, become His sons through grace, faith, and the work of Jesus on the
Cross, not physical descent or the rituals of the Torah - (Romans
8:15, 8:23, 9:4, Ephesians 1:5).
Because we are “children,” God sent the “Spirit of
his Son into our hearts”. This summarizes the long argument that began at
the start of Chapter 3 when Paul reminded the Galatians that they received the
Spirit from a hearing of faith, and not from the “deeds of the Law”
– (Galatians 3:1-4).
The term “spirit of his Son” refers to the work of the
Holy Spirit conforming us to the Image of the Son, the same Spirit that prompts
us to cry out, “Abba, Father!” What greater proof of our acceptance into
the covenant community could we have than the Gift of the Spirit?
Paul concludes his argument: “So that you are no longer a
bondservant but a son; and if a son, then an heir through God.” In Christ, Jews
and Gentiles become “heirs” to the Abrahamic Covenant. Since we are “sons,”
filled with the Spirit and heirs of the Patriarch, why attempt to seek what the
Law could never deliver by subjecting ourselves to the requirements of the
Mosaic Legislation?
Adopting the deeds and rites of the Law would mean dividing the
Body of Christ along ethnic lines. However, since the “Seed of Abraham” has
arrived and redeemed us, the old social divisions are now inappropriate in the covenant
community.
Men and women are justified before God from the “faith of
Jesus,” and every disciple is a “child of God” and an “heir of
Abraham” regardless of biological descent. Why do some today still insist
on rebuilding the old walls dismantled by the sacrificial death of Jesus on the
Roman Cross?
[PDF Copy]
SEE ALSO:
- Ekklésia, the Assembly - (The Christian use of the term church or ekklésia is derived from the Assembly of Yahweh gathered for worship as described in the Hebrew Bible)
- One New Man - (By his Death and Resurrection, Jesus formed one new covenant community - One New Man - based on faith in him – Ephesians 2:11-22)
- Sons of God - (Returning to the custodianship of the Law would mean rebuilding the wall of separation between Jews and Gentiles)
- Un en Jésus-Christ - (Par sa Mort et sa Résurrection, Jésus a formé une nouvelle communauté d'alliance - Un Nouvel Homme - basée sur la foi en lui - Éphésiens 2: 11-22)
Comments
Post a Comment